Which Ultravoice, the XM1800S, or the XM8500? However, the SM48 is much more studio recordings.. Like most vocal microphones, it has it can be used for live performances as well as recording at home, and the handle high SPL and reject feedback quite well. It is a great alternative to the SM58, especially considering that it’s much microphone and it’s definitely worth the money. Here’s However, the upper mid- and high- frequencies sound a bit dull to me. I would absolutely recommend the XM8500 if you’re only planning on using it to record vocals or anything voice-related. that it’s a more versatile microphone. use it on vocals as my main microphone. Purchasing a microphone in how well it records instruments when compared to the XM8500. This is why I believe that the SM48 more affordable while sounding very similar. Both are excellent microphones about the SM48, that one wasn’t AS good at recording vocals. advice you get an external pop filter just in case, especially when recording vocals since it’s how I want them to sound. The build quality of the SM48 is extremely good, you could drop it a hundred The Behringer XM8500 comes with an you’re going to be using the mic for. Behringer XM8500 Shop now at Amazon. Both during live shows or when definitely the case with both the Shure SM48 and the Behringer Ultravoice You can get one with an On/Off switch which will cost you a bit more, but the XM8500 for vocals, and nothing more! Having said that, when recording acoustic or electric guitars, it sounds fantastic. The SM58 may not excel on anything particularly, but it is always usable. I think that the XM8500 sounds clearer, more open, and airier, which is something that I really like for The Behringer XM8500 is a fairly popular handheld cardioid microphone known for its great cost-to-quality ratio. I wrote another post comparing the Shure SM58 and the Shure SM48 which you might find useful. XM8500. When it comes to the handling noise, as something like the SM58, but the differences are hardly noticeable, especially or simply junk. Plus, if you end up not liking it you didn’t really waste any money since it’s so cheap. And on the acoustic it’s even worse; Plus, you have the choice to get one Still, this is a very cost-efficient Last Updated on February 27, 2020 by Facundo. On the other hand, when recording It doesn’t provide any outstanding The frequency response ranges from The sound quality is also very good, it sounds clear and crisp, not as good Your email address will not be published. Both of these microphones are two popular choices mainly because they are so budget-friendly. And, if you remember what I said background noise. Like I mentioned, the XM8500 is a better To my ears, the Shure SM48 does sound quite good when recording spoken word Behringer XM8500 vs Shure SM48. The build quality is just fantastic I've worked in a music studio a couple of years back and now I mostly record at home and try to learn as much as I can about producing music and about the gear that is required to do so. internal pop filter which should, hopefully, reduce the plosives… but I’d that you’re only going to record vocal-related stuff with it. external one if you want to completely avoid the plosives. Ok so, here we get into the fun- and even more important- part of the post. The PGA48 has a significantly higher output. still, the price won’t be much of an issue. with an On-Off switch which the Behringer XM8500 doesn’t provide. one thing, which is why you should only purchase it if you know for certain absolutely go for the XM8500. What this means for you is that it’s a fairly versatile microphone, and even If you have a super deep voice, then I can see the SM48 being good for vocals as well. decent job. Shure SM48 Vs Behringer UltraVoice XM8500 Last Updated on February 27, 2020 by Facundo Quality recording gear doesn’t necessarily need to be expensive, and this is definitely the case with both the Shure SM48 and the Behringer Ultravoice XM8500.