How to Customize the Windows 10 Context Menu, Only the best Black Friday & Cyber Monday tech deals, Remove the "3D Objects" Folder and Other Shortcuts From Windows' File Explorer. For an average of 40 fps or better all you’ll need is the Radeon HD 7950 or GTX 960. hide. The RTX 2080 and 1080 Ti were limited to around 105 fps which is honestly the kind of performance you’d hope to see at 1440p in a game like this. Although Ultra 1440p might be a bit too much for this GPU, it would return 46 FPS on High graphics setting. As we noted on the feature's opening, quad-core CPUs seem to be getting maxed out in this title, something we'll have to investigate further. We’ve thrown in a heap of older GPUs as well for good measure. News, Speculations, Memes, Artwork....... Maybe it's just my PC but after the last patch i got better framerates but the stutter comes and goes... Just wondering what kind of fps you get and at what settings with that card? Instead we are using the ‘propaganda center’ for our test though performance does appear to be close to the numbers you’ll get with the benchmark tool. If you’re here trying to find a fix for Borderlands 3’s stuttering problems, then you should head over to our dedicated Borderlands 3 lag & stuttering fix guide. The oldies still average 50 fps at 1080p, so that puts you on fully playable territory which is great. save. Entering a new area, crazy lag until it stables. Our benchmark was run using the ultra preset at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, then re-tested with a few GPUs at 1080p with the medium preset. The old GTX 970 does okay with 41 fps and we see just 39 fps from the RX 570. If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing... You need to be a member to leave a comment. The GTX 1650 is the cut off here though and even then you’ll want to start optimizing the quality settings for better performance. For testing we've used our Core i9-9900K test bed clocked at 5 GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 memory. Naturally for gaming at 4K you’ll want at least 6GBs of VRAM, although GPU horsepower becomes a larger issue at 4K and high-end GPUs have well over that amount of memory these days, so that should be a non-issue. Low vs Ultra Borderlands 3 Screenshot Comparison. The excellent value Radeon RX 570 saw a massive 109% performance uplift when downgrading the quality preset from ultra to medium. He was able to boost performance by around 50% using customized settings for virtually no image quality difference when compared to the Ultra preset. report. We got away with 4GB even at 1440p. Here we see a massive 80% performance improvement for the GTX 1660 when going from ultra to medium. We nearly lost count of how many graphics cards we put down for this test, but let's say it was roughly sixty GPUs from both camps to check out Borderlands 3 performance. We see some old GPUs like the GTX 970 performing well with the medium quality preset. as your post is 6 months old and I've read people and people say the crazy lag on menus and similar issues have been mostly patched. In summary, a good way to look at the performance with this GeForce GTX 970 4GB is to consider, do you want 1080p gaming with ok graphics settings or would you be needing 1440p resolution with bottom end graphics settings. There were loads of GPUs in this performance class, such as the R9 380X, 7970, 1050 Ti, 680, 1050, 380 and 680. If you’re here trying to get the best frame rates and the best performance, read on. Featuring bazillions of weapons, Borderlands 3 takes solo players or groups on a scum-hunting trip across the galaxy, exploring four planets for the first time in series history. Same here, running almost every setting on the lowest. The GTX 1060 saw a 75% performance increase and is now pushing 82 fps on average at 1080p. The place for everything Borderlands 3! To wrap up testing we ran a few GPUs with the medium quality preset while also adding more budget and older GPUs to the mix. Take a look at the following results to help you choose. So I can't say if something's changed, sorry. The GTX 1660 Ti does well here, basically matching the GTX 1070 while beating the old GTX 980 Ti, the flagship from a few generations back. As for memory, you’ll also want 16GB of RAM for smooth performance, we often saw total system usage around 7GB when running Borderlands 3, with the game itself consuming around 3GB. Dropping below 50 fps you’ll find GPUs such as Vega 56 and 64 along with the GTX 1070 and 1660 Ti. With medium settings it average 65 fps which is decent, though for less money the RX 570 was nearly 30% faster, hence our usual recommendation in favor of the budget Radeons. When compared to the standard RTX 2060, the Radeon 5700 was 8% faster, so not a huge margin and that means it should be comparable to the 2060 Super. The R9 290 is also hanging in there quite comfortably with 67 fps on average. It’s a shame the quality presets do so poorly in this title. For an average of 40 fps or better all you’ll need is the Radeon HD 7950 or GTX 960. Any new? On that note, if you're looking to squeeze the best possible Borderlands 3 performance with a marginal visual hit, check out Tim’s excellent optimization guide on YouTube. Archived. GPU: AMD Radeon RX 590 / Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6GB) OS: Windows 7-10. We also so a big 78% increase for the R9 390, though it wasn't as staggering as the 570's jump. Borderlands 3 seems to hammer the CPU quite a bit and we suspect the DRM is to blame for that. The standard RTX 2080 was 21% slower rendering 71 fps on average and we see a further 7% performance downgrade with the 2070 Super. It looks like with Borderlands 3, despite seven years (and a raft of rival loot shooters) having passed since Borderlands 2, Gearbox has stuck to its however-many-millions of guns. Did you manage to optimize it? Starting from the top we have, of course, the RTX 2080 Ti where it pumped out an average of 122 fps, which for 1080p doesn’t seem all that high. Maybe we would have done more benchmarking using tweaked graphics settings across the board but by the time we had the information we were already 50 GPUs deep into testing. FPS i get are between 45 and 60 because i use vsync, but stutters happen even without vsync and at every setting high or low. Borderlands 3 performance: How to get the best settings. There’s a relatively new GPU we've yet to mention and that’s because it was too slow using the ultra quality settings, the GTX 1650. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Change Ad Consent Advertise. I don't even remember how it used to run the last time I played. That said, with Tim’s optimizations the 2080 Ti should be good for a little over 70 fps on average in our test. GTX 970 and stutter [ Question ] Close. Once we get down to the GTX 1660 you’ll really need to reduce the quality settings for better performance. As per my research, manual editing of .ini files is key here. The standard 2070 and non-XT version of the 5700 were comparable in terms of performance, pushing frame rates into the mid 50s. Posted by 1 year ago. The Golden Joystick Awards 2020: Nvidia takes hardware category; God of War: Ragnarok... Ryzen 5000 CPU support is coming to 400 series chipsets sooner than expected, IO Interactive partners with Intel to enhance Hitman 3 for CPUs with 8+ cores, Here's how much Crytek paid Denuvo to protect Crysis Remastered from pirates, Bitcoin hits $18,000 mark for the first time since 2017, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. As for graphics memory, 4GB appears fine for 1080p. Borderlands 3 welcomes back the classic co-op looter shooter series. This time the 2070 Super was 11% faster than the 5700 XT, but again that doesn’t really justify the 25% increase in price. For testing we're running the game in the DirectX 11 mode which we found to be overall smoother than DX12, which is still in development for this title. Anyone else playing with a 970 and getting okayish fps but constant fps dips causing stutter? The GTX 1660 also averaged over 55 fps in our test whereas the RX 590 fell below 50 fps. share. A little further down we see the standard 5700 averaged 80 fps in our test making it a little faster than the GTX 1080 on average and much better when comparing the 1% low data.