Finally, the Pixel 3a’s front 8-MP camera is serviceable, but you don’t get the extra wide-angle lens that the regular Pixel 3 offers, so group selfies are a little more challenging. The fingerprint sensor is nicely located in the top middle portion of the device’s rear panel, and the primary camera is kept in the top left corner of the handset. Luckily, there are tons of cheap Android phones to choose from that are more …, Google has announced the Google Pixel 3a and Pixel 3a XL at Google I/O 2019. Unfortunately however, Google did have to skimp on the Pixel 3’s wireless charging to achieve the lower price. The Google Pixel line has long been called one of the greatest Android experiences on the market. Many anxiously await the Pixel 4a and 4a XL. In the Pixel 3a’s case, this came down to Google building the phone out of plastic instead of glass. That means sometimes you’ll have to wait a hair longer for HDR+ photos or bokeh-effect portraits to finish processing after the fact. To save money, many OEMs drop certain features and slack on software updates. While the news is still good, Google’s official reasoning is …, In a world where high-end Android smartphones can cost $1,000 or more, many consumers want something that won't break the bank. Below, you can see the camera brightening up scenes, bringing a more even exposure to most of the shot. https://www.pcworld.com/article/3409052/google-pixel-3a-review.html The Pixel 3a comes with a 3,000mAh battery and it gets the job done. You might want to consider the 3a XL if those are the features you prefer. In fact, most of the time, it was hard to discern a difference in responsiveness compared to the Snapdragon 845-powered Pixel 3 with respect to opening and closing software and scrolling in apps. Unlike its older siblings, the Pixel 3a doesn’t include a USB-C to 3.5mm headphone jack adaptor in the box. It’s plenty fast, takes great pictures, and has a killer price tag. And then, of course, there’s Night Sight — a feature that has made its way to the Pixel 3a gloriously intact, and capable of the same feats of software magic that it grants in the Pixel 3. Here’s hoping that Google makes the feature available with the Pixel 4a. Comments (140) User reviews; Pixel 3a XL; Google Pixel 3a XL review - Reader comments. Just like with other storage minimums over the years, it might be time to retire 64GB as the default. The 3a offers much of the Pixel 3 functionality for significantly less money. With a peak of 401 nits, this display comes in well below the 488-nit average, though its sRGB color gamut coverage and Delta-E accuracy scores of 182.3% and 0.18, respectively, are very good and in line with modern flagships. Google Pixel 3a vs. Pixel 3 camera: What do you lose? There isn’t much new to say about the software on the Pixel 3a. I would have preferred the port on the bottom based on how I put the Pixel 3a in my pocket, but I don’t use wired headphones often, so it ultimately didn’t make a difference for me. Stereo speakers (one downward facing), Active Edge, USB Type-C, single nano-SIM, Google Pixel 3a: 4GB RAM, 64GB ROM — $299. For $399, you'll be hard pressed to find a phone that includes more for the money. As for the front, Google has replaced Corning’s Gorilla Glass, used in the pricier models, with AGC’s Dragontrail strengthened glass — an alternative usually found in cheaper handsets. Unfortunately the dedicated Pixel Visual Core image signal processor isn’t present on the 3a, so photos aren’t quite as sharp or as detailed as they are on the higher-priced Pixel phones, but they’re still fantastic for a phone in this price range. As such, handsets have crossed the thousand-dollar threshold to give us the specs they’ve convinced us we need, as premium phones have all sought to outdo each other with cameras, RAM, storage, and pixels. At that price, it matches some of its fiercest competitors. Those speakers can get pretty loud, but the quality appears a bit more compressed than what you get from the Pixel 3 and 3 XL. The Nokia 7.1, a modern adversary for the Pixel 3a featuring a slightly less-powerful Snapdragon 636 CPU, couldn’t quite match Google’s new handset, as it fell just short at 4,953. ©2020 Android Authority | All Rights Reserved.