Translations differ in how they render this reference to Judas (though they often have a footnote saying that "son of perdition" is the word-for-word equivalent). By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. He was protecting them from Satan! In sequence models, is it possible to have training batches with different timesteps each to reduce the required padding per input sequence? 12 While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given me; and I guarded them and not one of them perished but the son of perdition, so that the Scripture would be fulfilled. "the one doomed to destruction" is wrong, and that we should stick with the literal "son of destruction", or do you think it is acceptable? How do you reconcile this when the Bible says the Father cannot be seen? This can mean both "male offspring" or, more generically, "descendant". 2 Thessalonians 2:3 "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;" King James Version, 1611. "apoleias" This is a warning: even though it's inevitable that "offenses" will happen, do not be the offender! How to place 7 subfigures properly aligned. Jesus allowed Judas to be tempted--he withdrew his protection from Judas so that Satan could enter into his heart--and Judas chose to turn away from God and from Jesus. [15], "Revelation," The People on the Earth: Chapters 2-3, Letter to Ephesus, v 13. I think some perspective on the matter can be found in Luke: 1 Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come! Title of book about humanity seeing their lives X years in the future due to astronomical event, How do rationalists justify the scientific method. By saying, "Those whom You gave Me, I have kept; and none of them is lost except the son of perdition" (John 17:12), is Jesus saying that He lost someone that He was expected to keep or should have kept? After that point (in John 17), Jesus calls Judas the "son of destruction". Similar uses of "son" occur in Hebrew, such as "sons of corruption" (Isaiah 1:4 בָּנִים מַשְׁחִיתִים banim mashchitim), however the exact Hebrew or Greek term "son of perdition" does not occur in Jewish writings prior to the New Testament. In fact, there are two people to which the title “son of perdition” is applied. D. A. Carson suggests that this verse refers both to Judas' character and to his destiny.[1]. Looking at the Vines entry, this definitely means "son". Then Satan entered Judas, called Iscariot, one of the Twelve. rev 2020.11.24.38066, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but, Christianity Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. Is there any evidence for the claim that the Catholic church suppressed translation of Scripture? If he is "the one who chose to be lost" or "the son of perdition/destruction", then he could be a more active participant in his own downfall. The Mormon Church teaches that Joseph Smith saw God the Father and His Son. 6 He consented, and watched for an opportunity to hand Jesus over to them when no crowd was present. The phrase simply means “man doomed to destruction” and is not reserved for any one individual. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. How to limit population growth in a utopia? Paraphrases tend to pull theology from other places in the bible in order to interpret specific phrases. [13] John related the "Son of Perdition" concepts by language, referring to "the star that fell from heaven" Revelation 9:1 by two names, one Greek, and the other Hebrew. Is John the Baptist the same John who wrote the Book of John in the New Testament? Clearly, there was plotting involved, a conscious effort to betray Jesus, and a choice that Judas made. Strong G3588. With that temptation, Judas was allowed to choose to betray Jesus--which he did. The problem with looking at things too closely is that we often lose sight of the bigger picture. The choice of using the word "perdition"is acceptable in the old form of the word ("utter destruction"), however it has taken on the connotation of "eternal damnation" and so it's no longer an appropriate translation, in my opinion. What LEGO piece is this arc with ball joint? Judas intentionally plotted against Jesus and consented to the betrayal. (Revelation 9:11) The Greek name is "Apollyon" (Greek: Aπολλυων), from the Greek root word "apollumi" (Greek:απολλυμι). It only takes a minute to sign up. For what modules is the endomorphism ring a division ring? While, yes, he was a "son of destruction" this was due to his actions and his choices. How to sustain this sedentary hunter-gatherer society? 4 And Judas went to the chief priests and the officers of the temple guard and discussed with them how he might betray Jesus. Therefore was fully guilty of the betrayal. site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. Judas chose the path to ruin when he determined to betray Jesus. Of the kings that came after Antiochus nothing is here prophesied, for that was the most malicious mischievous enemy to the church, that was a type of the son of perdition, whom the Lord shall consume with the breath of his mouth and destroy with the brightness of his coming, and none shall help him.